Chlorides from both runoff and water softeners have contributed to rising concentrations in area streams.
To counter this trend, future chloride conservation efforts should include appropriate winter salt application and updating water softeners to function optimally.
Chloride from water softeners passes through septic systems and wastewater treatment plants to our water resources.
On this Page
Learn how chloride from road salt and water softeners reaches water resources and regional initiatives to reduce future chloride increases.
Overview
Road Salt Trends
Surface Water Impact
Other Chloride Sources
Long Term Trends in Chloride Concentrations
Regional Chloride Initiatives
What Can You Do?
Overview
The salt we use in and around our homes and throughout our communities ultimately reaches our water resources. Deicers used in winter maintenance washes off roads, sidewalks, and parking lots into surrounding soil and water. Chloride in these deicers harms vegetation and can reach levels toxic to aquatic organisms in streams following snowmelt. Adding salt to the environment also negatively impacts human health, pets, wildlife, and infrastructure. In the greater Madison region, four bodies are listed as impaired for chloride by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (see map). Once chloride is added to the environment, there are no natural removal mechanisms.
Since chloride dissolves in water and easily moves, winter salt application contributes to increasing chloride levels in our lakes, rivers, and groundwater. Researchers analyzing data from multiple states, including Wisconsin, have documented stream chloride levels increasing as developed urban areas expand. These increases can be observed year round, not simply after a winter storm event. The chloride that enters groundwater from winter salt application acts as a reserve and increases surface water chloride concentrations in other seasons as groundwater slowly feeds rivers and streams throughout the year. Chloride in groundwater also reaches municipal and private wells. Water from shallower wells are likely to have higher chloride concentrations than water from deeper wells.
Besides winter deicing, another use of salt in this region is in softening household water. Both private and municipal wells have hard water high in calcium and magnesium. Water softeners in each building use salt in the process of removing hard minerals. Chloride from these softeners leave in wastewater, either entering a septic system or a wastewater treatment plant. Since these wastewater treatment systems are not designed to remove chloride, the chemical continues through, ultimately reaching ground or surface water. Septic systems drain through leach fields where water percolates down to groundwater. Wastewater treatment plants discharge their effluent into regional streams and rivers. While current sewage treatment effectively removes many contaminants from wastewater, chloride is not one of them and installing new technologies to do so can be prohibitively expensive. Reducing overall chloride use is therefore a more economical method for achieving chloride reduction goals.
Explore this page to learn more about specific regional initiatives addressing our chloride issue. From tracking winter salt use and promoting best management practices to continued research and monitoring by universities and government agencies, the region is actively working to address chloride impacts and support chloride reductions. Find out what is going on near you and learn about actions you can take to reduce chloride!
Road Salt Trends
The amount of road salt used in winter maintenance across Wisconsin has increased since the 1960's. The combination of an increase in miles of roads that need to be maintained and an increase in the amount of salt applied per mile results in more than a total of 550,000 tons or 16 tons of salt per mile (annual average over past five years) applied each winter to Wisconsin's Trunk Highway system. These total salt volumes only include the amount reported to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation by county highway departments which does not include the amount used by local municipalities, contractors, or private citizens.
- Hover over each point to see increase from 1960
Wisconsin Salt Use on State Trunk Highways
Data Source: WisDOT Annual Winter Maintenance Report 2016-2017 History of Salt Use on State Trunk Highways. Data submitted through Salt Inventory Reporting System.
New development results in additional impervious surfaces - roads, parking lots, and sidewalks - that require winter maintenance and lead to increased salt use. Compared to the surrounding region, Dane County has the most miles of State Trunk Highways. The amount of salt applied each winter depends on the winter's severity (an index is calculated incorporating the number of snow events, the number of freezing rain events, and amount of snow). Typically a lower severity index results in less salt application and lower winter costs. In the winter of 2017-2018, Vernon County had the highest winter severity index in the region, but the most salt applied per lane mile was in Columbia County. In terms of total costs for salt, however, Dane County leads the region in the amount spent on winter salt and the total amount applied (over 35,000 tons in the winter of 2017-2018).
- Hover over each county to see additional details
Winter 2017-2018: Regional Salt Use on State Trunk Highways
Data Source: WisDOT Annual Winter Maintenance Report 2017-2018 History of Salt Use on State Trunk Highways. Data submitted through Salt Inventory Reporting System.
With dense development, Dane County is particularly impacted by increasing chloride use, and long term monitoring has documented how salt application reaches our surface waters.
Surface Water Impact
Chloride levels can become toxic to aquatic life as snowmelt runs into streams. Wisconsin has developed a chloride chronic toxicity threshold for aquatic life of 395 mg/L and an acute threshold of 757 mg/L. Prolonged exposure to chloride concentrations above chronic levels adversely effects organisms, and exposure at acute levels can be lethal. Short-term pulses may exceed chronic or acute levels during snowmelt conditions, causing this to be an area of increasing concern. At Spring Harbor, winter and spring monitoring has documented toxic chloride levels following salt application and snowmelt (see graph below). During the summer, chloride in snowmelt that has seeped into groundwater recharges streams and contributes to increasing chloride concentrations year round. USGS monitoring has documented increasing baseflow summer concentrations in Pheasant Branch and the west branch of Starkweather Creek, both listed as impaired by WDNR for chloride. While chloride concentrations are lower in the summer than they are in the winter, increasing summer concentrations demonstrate that winter chloride application has year round effects. At Pheasant Branch, summer chloride concentrations increased from 20 mg/L in the 1970's to 100 mg/L in 2013.
- Select specific sites and/or seasons to change the display
- Hover over each data point to see additional details
- Adjust the year scale to change the range of dates displayed
Seasonal USGS Monitoring
Data Source: Water quality field samples collected by USGS at Spring Harbor, West Branch Starkweather Creek, Pheasant Branch.
See more about chloride monitoring in Starkweather Creek here. Data collected by Public Health Madison & Dane County and presented in 2017 Road Salt Report
Other Chloride Sources
In addition to winter road salt application, chloride in surface water can increase as the result of resident, business and industrial uses. Chloride used in water softeners for treating hard water leaves houses and businesses and flows to regional wastewater treatment plants. Click here to see chloride and hardness levels in water from Madison's municipal wells (all wells exceed the 180 mg/L of calcium carbonate that constitutes very hard water). Groundwater already contains some chloride and water softeners add more which means that wastewater leaving a home contains half a pound of chloride daily (study conducted by Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District). Since treatment plants are not designed to remove chloride, and it is very expensive to upgrade systems to do so, chloride passes through the plant and is discharged in effluent. Many regional plants have variances for the amount of chloride they can discharge and must implement source reduction strategies to comply with their wastewater permits. A study from the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) found that water softeners were the source of 57% of their chloride, road de-icing contributed 7%, and the background amount of chloride in municipal wells accounted for 8%. Chloride levels decrease downstream of effluent discharges as effluent is diluted with other baseflow. The graph below show results of chloride monitoring downstream of effluent discharges from MMSD, the Village of Oregon, and the City of Stoughton in Badfish Creek and the Yahara River. Notice that the three tributaries that flow into Badfish Creek (shown in shades of blue) generally have chloride levels below 20 mg/L.
- Zoom in the map to see monitoring and effluent discharge sites
- Hover over each mapped site to see data highlighted on the graph
Stream Monitoring Sites Downstream of Effluent Discharges
Data Source: Water quality samples collected by MMSD and USGS. Samples collected during the growing season under baseflow conditions. Median result for each year is shown.
Long Term Trends in Chloride Concentrations
Even in streams that do not have direct effluent discharges, regional chloride concentrations have been increasing at some monitoring sites. While average concentrations remain much lower than what is observed in effluent, these significant increases mean that stream conditions are changing. Average chloride concentrations in the Yahara River near Stoughton have risen from 42.32 mg/L in 1997 to 64.7 mg/L twenty years later (show in red below). This linear increase suggests that average chloride concentrations will continue to rise. This graph shows seven sites with significant increases in chloride concentrations over the past twenty years. Most of these sites are not downstream from wastewater discharges, pointing to winter salt application as a likely cause of baseflow increases. Chloride applied during the winter can seep into groundwater and then increase surface water concentrations as groundwater recharges streams throughout the summer.
- Zoom in the map to see monitoring locations
- Hover over the data point to see the location, average chloride concentration, and the number of samples collected
Monitoring Sites Showing Chloride Increases
Chloride concentrations are also increasing in local lakes. Water with salt in it is more dense and sinks to the bottom, which prevents lake mixing in the spring and fall. Without this mixing, oxygen-depleted water at the bottom of a lake is not replaced with oxygen-rich water from the surface. Without replenished oxygen from the surface, conditions for aquatic life towards the bottom of the lake degrade. Therefore, steadily increasing chloride concentrations is a concern for the lake ecosystems.
Since 1970, chloride concentrations have increased approximately 1 mg/l per year in the Yahara chain of lakes. This has not occurred in Fish Lake, located in rural northwestern Dane County. Only 6% of the Fish Lake watershed is developed, meaning less salt use compared to the urbanized Madison watersheds.
The highest chloride concentrations are detected in Lake Wingra which has the most urbanized watershed (65% developed) of the six Yaraha lakes. Chloride accumulation in Lake Wingra illustrates the biggest impact of long-term winter salt application. Lake Mendota, with only 27% of its watershed developed, has the lowest chloride concentrations within the chain of lakes. The other three (Monona, Waubesa and Kegonsa) all have similar chloride concentration trends and have watersheds that are roughly 34% developed.
The interactive display below shows changes in chloride concentrations over time, as well as depth profiles of chloride concentrations in Fish, Mendota, Wingra, and Monona. Click Lake Wingra on the map to display high winter chloride concentrations towards the bottom of the lake.
Data Source: Average annual surface chloride concentrations for Lake Wingra, Lake Mendota, Lake Monona, Lake Waubesa, and Lake Kegonsa are from the Public Health Madison & Dane County 2019 Road Salt Report. Data for Fish Lake and chloride concentrations at various depths for Lake Wingra, Lake Monona, and Lake Mendota are from North Temperate Lakes Long-Term Ecological Research Network.
The UW - Madison Arboretum, upstream of Lake Wingra, uses chloride sparingly by applying a sand and salt mix on roads and manually removing snow and ice before applying salt in pedestrian areas. Conscious efforts by winter salt applicators can reduce overall salt use, while still maintaining safe winter conditions. The combination of these efforts will help to slow the chloride increases in these lakes.
Regional Chloride Initiatives
Agencies across the region seek to reduce chloride use and continue to monitor and research changing chloride concentrations.
What Can You Do?
Pulse inputs from road salt runoff and consistent chloride inputs from water softeners have increased chloride in our region's water. Future actions should target chloride reductions through best management practices for winter salt application and water softener maintenance or replacement.